Tuesday, April 24, 2012

2011 FSN Football Report Card

Counted up FSN's report card for 2011.  Several more games due to the addition of C-USA and extra Pac-12 games so the same size is larger.

Here's what I found:
  • FSN's Saturday coverage, on average, could be found as available in 87% of regions at any point.  So for regions with two affiliated RSNs or a Plus/Alternate channel, if the game was one, at some point no later than halftime, I counted it as showing the game.
  • The Pac-12 had the best Saturday clearance rate at 93.5%.  The Big 12 was cleared at about 86% on Saturdays and C-USA at slightly less than 85%.  Both the Big 12 and C-USA clearance rates drop due to two factors on Saturdays:
    • Both conferences suffered pre-emptions from Pac-12 regional games
    • The 7pm ET slot has a number of pro sports pre-emptions
  • Which Saturday time slots are the best?  12pm &1:30pm ET (94.7%) and late evening (10-10:30pm, 93.4%).   The mid-afternoon slot was slightly below average at 85.5% but the 7pm slot, as noted above, had a clearance rate of only 77%.
  • C-USA had the three Thursday night games but the clearance rate was about the same as the 7pm Saturday games at 77%.  Pre-emptions from MLB and the NHL affected those rates.
  • I suspect the NBA lockout helped FSN's clearance rate overall but don't have a clear way to prove that.  FSN did more 3:30pm ET starts in '11 (12 vs. 7 in '10) and less 7pm games (9 vs. 11 in '10), but the clearance rate was nearly even in both slots
  • Five regions carried every game in some form:
    • FOX Sports Houston 
    • FOX Sports Midwest
    • FOX Sports South & SportSouth
    • FOX Sports Southwest
    • Comcast SportsNet Bay Area & California
    • The combo of FOX Sports North & Wisconsin was able to clear the entire Saturday package
  • Four regions were well below the 87% clearance rate
    • CSN New England (50%)
    • ROOT Sports Pittsburgh (55%)
    • CSN Philadelphia & Comcast Network (70%)
    • MSG & MSG Plus (77%)

Note that my data used DirecTV listings in addition to what the networks themselves listed on their websites.  I know that MSG & MSG Plus in western New York might have cleared games that the main feeds of these channels didn't, but they didn't always make it know that the games were available.  Same with the CSN New England overflow channel that seems to be only available on some cable systems.

For FSN I don't know what will change now that the Pac-12 is leaving the regional nets in favor of their new deal.  I don't know that C-USA's clearance rate will improve as the ROOT Sports nets out west will be clearing a Big Sky game for most of October and November.  If the Big 12 moves more games to F/X and possibly FOX broadcast network, they might have some timeslots that C-USA could fill in.  Stay tuned.

3 comments:

bigddan11 said...

If the Big 12 gets some from FSN moved to Fox, then I expect FSN to pick up more CUSA games solely because that's the only other contract they have. However they should air at least 1 CUSA game weekly on FCS (in my opinion) in addition to the FSN games if they really want to increase the conferences exposure.

Matt said...

I don't know if they have the ability to do so or if the games are worth it at that point. After FOX takes its second ten games, CBS Sports Network takes at least another five. Many of those teams depend on regional television deals for extra cash.

bigddan11 said...

CUSA has 12 teams. Out of those 12 teams, SMU and UAB don't even have local TV deals and have very limited streaming deals (as in they show a video of the game with the radio announcers). Some, like UTEP, have cable deals that are done mostly on tape delay. Out of 6 games a week, roughly 2 are shown on national TV with Fox getting one and CBSSN getting 1. Are you trying to tell me they honestly couldn't negotiate with Fox to get at least one of those remaining 3 on FCS considering that Fox is likely to pay more than most of those local providers do and considering there are some teams that have horrendous deals? Heck, that's one of the reasons SMU is leaving for the Big East. Big East Network has a provider for football already in the Metroplex, meaning SMU is getting more games on TV because of moving conferences. I realize some of those games have to be protected for local TV broadcasts, but that would still protect 2 games a week for local TV/ PPV broadcasts and it certainly would expose the conference more. You can't tell me FCS isn't looking for games to replace the Pac-12 broadcasts they've lost from the local affiliates. CUSA may very well be that solution, especially if they do the same type of deal where they use a local broadcast feed for the game. The only FCS games that aren't done with a local broadcast feed are the Big XII's 5 exclusive FCS games.